Terracycle: The Pitfalls of Unclear Environmental Programs

Back in college I was both an RA and an Eco Peer Educator. One of the programs we tried to run was Terracycle, which was supposed to collect hard to recycle items like chip bags or granola bar wrappers and send them off to be repurposed. On paper it sounded creative and impactful. In reality it never really worked.

The problem was not that students did not care about the environment. The problem was messaging. Terracycle required people to sort very specific kinds of packaging into special bins, but the instructions were too abstract and too easy to ignore. Posters listed categories of acceptable waste, but when you are standing in a dorm lounge with an empty wrapper, the last thing you want to do is decode a chart. Most people just tossed it in the trash.

We also never connected the effort to any visible outcome. Students were asked to change their habits, but they never saw what happened next. Did the wrappers actually get shipped? What were they turned into? How much waste did we divert as a floor or a building? With no feedback, the program felt like effort going into a void.

That experience shaped how I think about environmental work now. Awareness by itself is not enough. People need clear and immediate cues for action, and they need to see proof that their effort makes a difference. When the loop is broken, when instructions are confusing on the front end and the results are invisible on the back end, even the most motivated group will quietly stop participating.

Programs like Terracycle are not doomed, but they live or die on clarity and trust. That was the real lesson I took from trying to make it work in the messy reality of a college dorm.

Copyright © 2025 Ryan Badertscher. All rights reserved.